Trump’s New Trade War Front – Labor, Bags and Sneakers — Panjiva
Más

Panjiva_research_logo

Trump’s New Trade War Front – Labor, Bags and Sneakers

China 1760 Cons. Discr. - Apparel 214 Tariffs 1170 U.S. 3301

The U.S. Trade Representative may launch another section 301 review of Chinese commercial practices, focusing on labor rights such as the right to organize and safety standards, Inside Trade reports. That follows the Trump administration’s section 301 review of intellectual property rights which, as shown in Panjiva research of Oct. 30, formed the legal back for the Trump administration’s tariffs on Chinese exports. That process has already led to duties on $250 billion of Chinese exports focused on electronics and capital goods.

While President Trump has repeatedly threatened to apply duties to all Chinese exports there may be concerns that this over-stretches the purpose of the original section 301 review. A new review based on labor rights would provide a more solid grounding for duties on labor-intensive industries. That would capture industries including apparel, the textiles value chain, leather products (such as luggage) and footwear, based on World Bank estimates of labor intensity.

Panjiva data shows that Chinese exports of those four categories were worth $61.6 billion in the 12 months to Sept. 30, or 11.5% of total Chinese exports to the U.S.

There has been a decline with a 3.8% decline annually over the past three years as manufacturers switch out of China to other Asian states, though China still accounted for 40.7% of total U.S. imports of the four categories.

CHINA THE LARGEST APPAREL SUPPLIER, BUT OTHERS GAINING GROUND

Chart segments U.S. imports of apparel, fabrics / fibers, footwear and luggage by origin on a monthly (dotted) and annual average (solid) basis.   Source: Panjiva

The practice in the IP-related section 301 review was to target very specific products first with higher duties and then become less discerning at lower rates after. Panjiva analysis shows that, in that regard the largest import lines in the 12 months to Sept. 30 were: handbags and luggage worth $6.16 billion, which are already covered by 10% duties under the previous review; sneakers worth $4.69 billion; and sweaters worth $4.61 billion.

BAGS MAY BE SENT PACKING, SHOES GET A KICKING FROM TARIFFS

Chart segments U.S. imports of apparel, fabrics / fibers, footwear and luggage from China by product (HS-4) for the 12 months to Sept. 30.   Source: Panjiva

American apparel and footwear retailers are already preparing for the potential of rising duties, many already face duties of 10% on imports of luggage including handbags. Ralph Lauren CEO CEO Patrice Louvet has stated the firm is “continuing to diversify our supply chain to mitigate the long term impact of potential tariff scenarios.” Similarly Steve Madden CEO Edward Rosenfeld has indicated the company’s main response is to “aggressively shift production out of China”.

The leading retail importers of the four categories mentioned by sea since the start of 2017 include Target (2.1% of the total, or 58.8k TEUs), JC Penney (27.9k TEUs), Samsonite (15.7k TEUs), Skechers (13.3k TEUs) and WalMart (11.0k TEUs). However, there’s likely to be an impact on all retailers, potentially raising the risk that the import duties are passed through to consumers in what would effectively be a – potentially unpopular – regressive tax.

TARGET, PENNEY AND WALMART HAVE COMPLEX CHINA-RELIANT APPAREL SUPPLY CHAINS

Chart segments U.S. seaborne imports of apparel, fabrics / fibers, footwear and luggage from China by product (HS-4) and consignee for the 12 months to Oct. 30, denominated in TEUs.   Source: Panjiva

PANJIVA RESEARCH is a service provided by Panjiva, Inc. ("Panjiva") to relevant global subscribers, and are deemed to be Panjiva "Services" subject to the Panjiva Terms & Conditions of Use. Information contained within or made available via the Services is for informational purposes only and nothing in the Services shall constitute or be construed as an offering of financial instruments, or as investment advice or recommendations by Panjiva, Inc. or its affiliates of an investment strategy or whether to "buy", "sell" or "hold" an investment. The Services may include views and commentary about customers of Panjiva. No aspect of the Services is based on consideration of your individual circumstances, and you should determine on your own whether you agree with the information contained within or made available via the Services. Employees involved in Panjiva Research may hold positions in securities analyzed or discussed in the Services. Panjiva does not make any express or implied warranties, representations, endorsements or conditions with respect to the Services and the information contained within or made available via the Services, including without limitation, warranties as to the usefulness, completeness, accuracy, currentness, reliability or sufficiency of any information (including, without limitation, conclusions, statements, opinions, estimates, forecasts or projections of any kind) and expressly disclaims any implied warranties. Neither this disclaimer nor any of its contents may be forwarded or redistributed without the prior written consent of Panjiva. © 2019 Panjiva, Inc. All Rights Reserved.